Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CDM Event Modelling - KnockIn Function #66

Closed
Vijayesh-Chandel opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

CDM Event Modelling - KnockIn Function #66

Vijayesh-Chandel opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 8 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Vijayesh-Chandel
Copy link

CDM Event Modelling - KnockIn Function

As part of Phase 2 of the FX Pilot for Legend Studio, the WG had designed a CDM event function for KnockIn (KI) lifecycle events:
See Minutes 9Jul20 for details.

At the time the Studio feature for creating functions was to be built and submission was pending, but now the feature is ready for use.

The following CDM primitives formed the proposed KI function:

  • ObservationPrimitive
  • ExercisePrimitive

However the CDM event model has since evolved and these primitives are deprecated. As a result, the proposed KI function will need further review and update, and ask is to collaborate on creating a new KI function solution for the CDM.

@agitana agitana added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Apr 2, 2021
@JamesR5270
Copy link

Hello, happy to get involved - I work for Skylight IPV covering FX options. James

@Vijayesh-Chandel
Copy link
Author

Hello, happy to get involved - I work for Skylight IPV covering FX options. James

Hi @JamesR5270, thanks for reaching out, be great to have you onboard. We're working on formalising a working group for this, will keep you posted.
Best,
Vijay

@rvincentISDA
Copy link

Hi, Include me in the thread. Thank you

@markajeffries
Copy link

Hi Vijay,
I have recently joined Skylight IPV and have taken over from James to head up our FX options service. Can you please include me on this going forwards?
Thanks,
Mark

@Vijayesh-Chandel
Copy link
Author

Hi @markajeffries - yes sure will include yourself. We are currently working through the planning of the WG with FINOS who will share more details soon.
Thanks,
Vijay

@JBZ-Fragmos
Copy link

hi @Vijayesh-Chandel - please include me and let mw know when you want to start working group
Thanks
Jean-Baptiste

@Vijayesh-Chandel
Copy link
Author

hi @Vijayesh-Chandel - please include me and let mw know when you want to start working group Thanks Jean-Baptiste

Thanks @JBZ-Fragmos we'll be in touch on this once good to start

@ffionwiggins
Copy link
Contributor

This will be the first issue tackled in the Structured Products Working Group. Look out for the upcoming invitations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants